GRAI reviews gambling licence fees after industry pushback
The Ireland Gambling Regulatory Authority (GRAI) is actively reconsidering its licensing fee structure in response to insights gathered from its recent public consultation.
This consultation, spanning four weeks in April and May 2025, resulted in 27 submissions from industry stakeholders, predominantly operators, who expressed significant concerns regarding the initial turnover-based fee model. The original framework was criticized for inadequately representing actual revenue, particularly disadvantaging niche betting services.
The GRAI is now exploring a more equitable tiered licensing model rooted in Gross Gambling Yield (GGY), aligning fees more closely with operators’ actual earnings rather than gross turnover. This change aims to create a comprehensive and fair fee structure within the evolving landscape of the gambling industry.
Key Insights from the Consultation
- Application Fees:** Stakeholders highlighted issues with the high application fees, which appeared disproportionately burdensome for smaller operators, potentially stifling innovation and competition.
- Lack of Clarity:** Industry members pointed to a need for greater transparency in the fee structure, advocating for clearer definitions and guidelines to navigate the regulatory environment effectively.
- Excessive Charges:** The proposed remote license fee of €20,000 and the annexed €1,200 per-premises fee have been labeled excessive, particularly for smaller businesses striving to maintain operational viability.
In light of this feedback, GRAI has signaled its willingness to modify the premises fee based on operational size, including considerations such as the number of gaming machines in practice. This response demonstrates the authority’s commitment to fostering a more inclusive regulatory climate that supports the diversity of the gambling sector.
While some operators have suggested that Ireland’s licensing fees should align with those of the UK, GRAI clarified that the distinct regulatory frameworks between the two jurisdictions prevent direct comparisons. However, the authority is open to reviewing its licensing structure and may adopt a hybrid approach that incorporates both GGY and turnover, ultimately aiming for a more just and representative model.
Considerations Moving Forward
GRAI noted that many regulatory responsibilities it will oversee differ from those managed by the Gambling Commission in Great Britain. Instead, these functions often fall under the purview of local councils, further complicating comparisons and standardizations across jurisdictions.
As the GRAI continues its review process, the aim remains clear: to refine the licensing framework in a way that not only ensures compliance and operational integrity but also nurtures a competitive environment for all operators in Ireland’s gambling industry.
